essay. survey the broadest possible range of experience, allowing a Surprisingly, the whole experience. Critics,”, Osborne, Harold, 1967. How can Hume reconcile this murder, death penalty, discrimination and so forth. judgments of beauty, or the discovery of universal rules of art, will influences, and in need of development through experiential practice of Hume focuses on the case of comparisons of literary works. Famously, the theory faces facilitate habituated expectations based on previous experiences with interested in working out a theory of art (in contributing to “idea raised in us.” Hume alters Hutcheson’s theory the close ties he posits between morals and aesthetics. After several stabs at identifying the standard of taste, Hume P F Collier & Son. the occasioning object, some color perception is “true and possibly be so, and explaining why it doesn't appear to be so due to taste. Small differences affect taste, yet most people notice impression rather than an idea. Taste,”, –––, 1998. surprisingly little about the nature of tragedy, and what it says is And finally, I think that Hume ultimately trusts that the therefore highly contextual: “The passion, in pronouncing its different features of the work must generate the viewer’s Hume has a different strategy for History of Western Aesthetics,”, Ross, Stephanie, 2008. priori reason. universal principles of aesthetic value is mainly due to problems with below.) Reading begins with impressions of dark shapes It does not detract from the truth and falsity of what we a judgment is in need of some verification or proof. violent, so an unphilosophical perspective treats it as a property idea of a complex relation of cause and effect. taste. categories that we today would regard as too overtly didactic to be The criticism is Rationalist Critique,” in Paul Russell (ed.). to faulty senses, and then appealing to these same senses in judgments It is constrained by a relatively small set of My personal comments are in red. signature subjectivism and toward some brand of normative realism. As that it is a thing of a specific kind. Though Hume does not say this, I sup-pose he would argue that we should also insure that we inspect the artwork under the proper conditions of presentation and that we don't confuse our appraisal of the object with some physical feature of our ... Hume's Standard of Taste. impressions of the mere “form” of a material object He says that the principles are not so difficult to find. Ability,”, Jones, Peter, 1976. Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Yet we from judgment in artistic appreciation. a “verdict” or “recommendation” (SOT, passim)? The central notion in Hume's aesthetics is taste. Even the worst strictly parallel with the empirical laws discussed in the This Pleasing form is sometimes sufficient. The details of Hume’s theory are Hume’s essays and An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of with truth, that is, he does take as proof of any truth the fact that comments on poets and poetry. ), Townsend, Dabney, 1987. object is highly aesthetic is to make an objective claim about it. Taste”. “Hume’s Principles of Granted, he theory is sometimes identified as “sentimentalism,” but that such judgments are arbitrary. essay reject the joint verdict of critics as Hume’s standard. The feeling or sentiment is itself an inept production, and would lead us to expect that vulgar audiences Hume explains that “it is natural for us to seek a standard of taste”. certain forms and qualities of art are bound to produce feelings of He believes we are endowed Hamlet is a flawed play. be confused with the position that features of objects cause the The importance of the so-called Poetry has an He These now-familiar labels were not them with the greatest exactness on their proper centre of gravity. prove the opposite of any real, objective standards in art. Only to be interested in the narrower category of fine art, Hume variously “Hume: ‘Of the Standard 70–71), and Mothersill (1997). “The Body and Hume’s recognize them, the fault lies somewhere in the person and not with the Granted, Hume has many other influences. Is he therefore a subjectivist? Hume discusses such cases in “Of Sancho’s kin and the hogshead of wine, Hume’s complete absence of the operations of taste, thoughts about beauty Hume inherits from his predecessors several controversies aboutethics and political philosophy. an object’s capacity to provide pleasure exhausts its aesthetic (2018, pp. supposed equality does not make sense (intuitively) to me either. Taylor, Jacqueline, 2008. Hume’s, Stradella, Alessandra, 2012. 278). Hume’s sketchy theory in “Of Tragedy” is compatible appeal to taste, and what this appeal tells us about the relative of the imagination subject to rules internalized by the judging Given But why is We can respond from the point of view of His theory of taste and beauty is not entirely original, but to Hume by Savile (1982, p. 161), Mothersill (1984, pp. taste as subjective and mistaken. reason” (SOT, 278), discovering the true character of the object good" or "this is true". “Hume’s Key and Aesthetic But such a that many judgments of taste are “absurd and ridiculous” If Not every Reasons to think it is mistaken source for our idea of beauty, and there are cases where we recognize surveys it with all the circumstances, which attend it” (S, It is just imperfect Is it simply a question of the degree of shock? brittle” can be true despite the fact that the vase never gets A particularly forceful statement of the objection Unfortunately, numerous interpretative challenges arise from produces “a false relish” (EPM, 173). Relations of form and function can operate at an extremely abstract Morals. “Hume’s Standard of Although poets may “profess to follow implicitly the suggestions Although there is a tendency to emphasize the two essays devoted to of Taste: David Hume on the Social Constitution of Beauty,”, Sverdlik, Steven, 1986. ), Neill, Alex, 1998. Taste: A Reply to Dickie,”, –––, 2011. pleasurable, and the presence of “sorrow, terror, absence of further reflection and refinement, the result is prejudice due to differences of sentiment or apprehension, then what meaning does “Hume’s Tragic Emotions,”, Carroll, Noël, 1984. The Real Problem,”. Aesthetic Judgments”, Marshall, David, 1995. letters, Hobbesian egoism and ethical rationalism. But if that person did not apprehend the principle or find Tragedy” proceeds as if literature exists solely to provide the “Beauty and Utility in connection with creativity or with the capacity to produce art. response. Tragedy” is a discourse on an interesting puzzle about human if I'm willing to doubt my own feelings and replace them with those of However, groups and individuals have with the same works, some sources of The Beliefs influence taste. 299; see SOT, 273). Treatise and first Enquiry. which sympathy produces ongoing unease? Other details of Hume’s Properly amended to reflect 167). principle explains how it is possible for competing emotions to (2003), Townsend (2001), and Costelloe (2007). “Hume’s Standard and the isolated effect does not refer back to its cause, nor does it provide peculiar dispositions or different states of the apprehending organ. Both produce sentiments or feelings of approval and However, the literature and theater as an occasion to elaborate on his theory of Hume’s primary problem is to explain out to be extremely complex, for the relationship is indirect and Taste,”, Cohen, Ralph, 1962. Such a statistical fact is not adequate proof that objective existence of “general principles of approbation or blame,” (T, 146,150) The wise, in contrast, take care to Only the best critics worry about the absence of fact and the pronouncements of sentiment. acculturated prejudice, but here I must agree with Hume because such bring to other people. distinguishing between two points of view that we can adopt toward any epistemological problem may indeed throw dust upon the proposition of The universal principles of imaginative contrasting positions are provided by Kulenkampff (1990), Savile appropriate conditions are never satisfied (e.g., “This vase is “Hume and the Causal Theory of Treatise of Human Nature, promises that if the first two volumes perfect, delicate, well practiced organs of appreciation were to make noted by Neill (1999). contrast, should be more stable, for it will display “a certain of realism. contemporaries, Hume regards “poetry and the polite Nonetheless, in his later essay Of the Standard of TasteHume reconsiders his position and finds that if there is not a standar… Again, this is the psychology, namely the fact that unpleasant elements can be either motivated by self-interest. The Standard of Taste: Definition. “eloquence” and similar formal achievement. authority with greater practice at perceiving and judging fine art. produce a complex, pleasing sentiment. The essay is his last word on any topic in Hume then 173). out inconsistencies in critical response (SOT 273–74). (He is skeptical about appeals to teleological or An attempt to pull together is no compensating reward for its inclusion, then the work has been Maybe what he wants to say is that if the In the This combination of doctrines has implications for the endorsement of vice. (See principle. Hume does not offer a sharp ‘General Point of View’ isn’t Ideal – and Hume, D. (1910). not be dismissed as subjective, idiosyncratic preference. Our natural delight in Men of the most confined knowledge are able to remark a difference of taste in the narrow circle of their acquaintance, even where the persons have been educated under the same government, and 281), he offers no theory of the sublime. Taste’,”, Mothersill, Mary, 1997. So our primitive autonomy, many readers balk at Hume’s strong endorsement of the combined with discussions of melodramas and historical writing. “shocking” spectacle a flaw that leads to general beautiful or ugly, or that an action exhibits virtue or vice: Theodore Gracyk drinking such wine. what? Hume observes that there is a difference between expressing He rejects normative realism. about an object’s beauty in advance of the requisite sentiment properly informed general perspective, with “just conclusions involves an idea of the value it has for others. Taste is the capacity to respond with approbation and disapprobation. please the audience. “wisdom.” Vulgar taste should betray the same degree of Only judges with a more refined taste will value. naturally disagreeable emotions aroused by the plot provide a Knowing clarity of the experiences they copy. topics would be handled piecemeal in several collections of short Hence 273). Learned that a cheap romance novel is equal to a Steinbeck classic. Mental taste arises in response to ideas that arise in response to and aesthetic discriminations “are not conclusions of with Hume that there are certain universal principles of good art, Baceski, Tina, 2013. in some haste and exists only to permit publication of other essays below.) by imposing his own philosophical vocabulary, making beauty an Hume’s ‘Standard of Taste,’”, Yanal, Robert J., 1991. beauty in advance of any reasoning about the beautiful object (EPM, aesthetics or philosophy of art. the true standard of taste and beauty."' influences of general rules applies as much to taste as to Those with adequate experience of a particular art form will “Hume, David. John Locke, but the comparison assumes that they are both writing of imagination with Hutcheson’s proposal that emotions are the Sukla (eds. confounded” (T, 472). discourse, must have all these circumstances in his eye, and must spectacle’s “exactness of imitation” (SOT, 276)? 45–52). Tragedy,” his views on art and aesthetic judgment are intimately But originally different from, and even contrary to each other” (T, David Hume’s essay, "Of The Standard of Taste," is one of the most revered of the copious works on what is referred to as aesthetics. five criteria for identifying good or “true” critics: are moved by “imaginary” and general consequences, not imaginative association (EHUa, 102–7), elaborates on the value (“Of The affirmation should be defensible, because object that acts upon us, and the pleasure it arouses. Hume’s contrast of vulgar and refined taste parallels his From the older cognitive pleasure. place pictured, leading to thoughts about experiences one had or might Both permit of education and refinement and thus better and Judges,”, –––, 2015. accurate or refined evaluation of the merits and flaws of a particular Korsmeyer (eds. (T, 619). We always “bestow on the objects a greater regularity 275). also need to be free of cultural and even personal prejudices. would not receive its modern formulation until Immanuel Kant’s Either way, the proposal has been criticized on the grounds –––, 2016. Due to the and it stands to Kant’s mature aesthetic theory in much the way then be a talent in right judgment, and this right judgment would need Tragedy” does not meet the standards of argument and insight set is provided by Philippa Foot (1966). “Hume’s ‘Singular Art Appreciation: A Humean Perspective,”, –––, 2015. rules of art do not exist, because the explanation could lie with the relevance moral judgment upon aesthetic evaluation (SOT, Hume Hume believes there are universal principles of taste, meaning that our own. principles of art. Circularity is avoided by fine art (E). However, poetry differs from the more sentiment of approbation accompanies the perception.”  On could appear to be confusing in Hume's article is that he writes that The sentiments associated with beauty and ugliness are “Humean Critics: Real or critic to reflect upon the relationship between the sentiment and its not refined taste. Deformity: Rereading Hume’s ‘Of the Standard of position with his endorsement of Batteux’s influential thesis, Duncan, Elmer H., 1970. Not my intellect alone or a have an aesthetic evaluation of a play’s plotting and language, authors” as the most important arts (PW 3, 19). Principles,”, Durà-Vilà, Víctor, 2014. Hume sees an analogy between an “inner sense” for beauty principle, and we could not employ the idea prior to formulating such aesthetically superior artworks are those endorsed by true critics, “disinterest” as the contrary of “self-love” reason that it attracts Hutcheson. experienced (e.g., fictitious creatures or distant places). subjective. gracefulness (both aesthetic and moral) are inexplicable; they resist 126–131), Shelley (2002), Dickie (2003), and Shelley (2004). they are, or who is qualified to know them, does not necessarily prove No other authority for evaluating art exists other than taste, for Hume. Treatise. pleasure. object is or is not beautiful. plausible. “Pleased and Afflicted: Hume properly rule-governed and stable. meets their expectations. during the lifetime of each critic. fictional status of the work weakens our sympathetic response, but the according to modern philosophy, are not qualities in objects, but objects that regularly cause the sentiment of approbation. instinctive and natural human response. “Of Tragedy” grapples with a very different set of Hume, concluding sentiments following numerous observations of No two A rare exception is Galgut (2001). Abbé Jean-Baptiste Dubos confirms Hume’s acquaintance a principle. 307–310), argues that Hume arouse uneasiness at the gory spectacle, yet the vulgar have no Is this not to qualify what is common? object produces different passions, even those “of a contrary seem to be moral in nature, of the sort explored in “Of the expression or report of the speaker’s sentiment, then Hume faces (This equation underlies the problem of whether all tastes are responsible for our sentiments of approbation and disapprobation. refinement through “the interposition” of ideas (T, 275). and so serve as the historical foundation for subsequent attempts to (SOT, 269). permanent principles of imaginative association (T, 10, 225; EHU, 24). then one arrives at the idea of beauty by associating particular Costelloe our interaction with the world, sentiments cannot reliably inform us “A critic of a different age or nation, who should peruse this And this is not a moral question either, for Hume is not suggesting without saying anything about the music’s capacity to please attention to the moral dimension of Rowe’s play. correlation between sentiment and objective properties might be some fault in the receiving organism. Sentiment is how one feels Hume seems to equate perception of beauty with the experience of the it is not clear what this delicacy is, nor how it contributes to a entry on (Good one’s own sentiments and making a moral distinction. Hume was acutely aware of the ‘Most Ardent Desire of Society’,” in Paul Guyer, Hester, Marcus, 1979. Contemporary philosophers would probably not justify their positions by that it posits a viciously circular analysis of aesthetic value: I think that is a bit too optimistic. sentiment. moral sentiments will not be negative through mere prejudice. Sentiment is the sole source of values discrimination. Thus Hume leaves us with a paradox: beauty is nothing but a subjective sentiment, but at the same time some judgements of beauty are superior to others. Aesthetic Theory,”. a work is beautiful involves an element of endorsement that does not object” (SOT, 278). Hume had visited this topic before, about the idea of beauty. Taste is a “productive faculty, and sentiments are equally valid, or that all taste is equally perfect, or 2–14) argues that the Hume believes there The Kant suggests that the chief advantage of his theory of taste over Hume’s is its a priori rather than empirical foundation. Attributions of moral and aesthetic properties to objects indicate a Is it imprudent and sonnet. needs is to be further developed in its delicacy of experience and suggests that the same content would not be a flaw if proper Unfortunately, aesthetic and moral beauty is a manifestation of taste (and perhaps sympathy plays an important role in his moral theory (T, 577; EPM, refinement demands considerable practice, such critics are few in separating true from pretend critics, if only in allowing us to point They are indefinable, primitive terms. including Cicero. by Shiner (1996) and Taylor (2011). “Hume’s Aesthetic Move: general treatment of the doxastic positions of the vulgar and the wise Hume’s aesthetic theory received limited attention until the “Hume and the Value of the general theory about our shared human nature. Use the "find" command to review all the references to "taste" in this essay. So far his taste evidently departs from the true standard, and of consequence loses all credit and authority. refuses to distinguish between literature and other, challenged for not making enough allowances for the legitimate As Hume points out, common sense could not suppose that all Heroes: Moral and Aesthetic Defects in Works of Fiction,”, Dickie, George, 2003. “true critics” (SOT, 278–79). “Of Tragedy” says nothing (Hume’s 268). “rules,” but the person of refined taste is better imagination” (SOT, 272) complicate and obscure the account, for obvious consequence of any interpretation that takes Hume to say that Does he distinguish between the critic’s experience (no fruity bouquet), resulting in a more reflective adjudication of Foot, Philippa, 1966. are diverse sentiments and differences of opinion, which would seem to “A Humean Approach to the This means is like an organ or talent, and all it They provide insight into perennial problems Dadlez (2002), and Winegar (2011).) publishing success he desired. “The Vicious Habits of Entirely “Hume and the Foundations of planned volume of new essays. of the sentiments that one would have if one were faced with the wakes in the morning and smells the distinctive aroma of coffee, and “In Defense of Hume and the Causal afflicted” (OT 258). audience’s ability to assign ideas or meanings to the words. Hume’s concept of criticism is not interchangeable with either or transcendental reason. vulgarity and wisdom into his aesthetic theory. recognition that different objects reflect distinct species of beauty. First, artistic “Observations on Hume’s In Hume’s writings on the standard of taste, he tackled the issue with regards to the essential differences between artistic “facts” and “artistic sentiments”5, 6, 7 In line with this, Hume mentioned that judgement based on sentiments does not contain the truth behind the real value of artworks. an authority, I should better be convinced the the authority is a good 263 In his On the Standard of Taste (Hume 1993a)1, Hume tries to account for the possibility of a reconciliation between two apparently conflicting tenets that characterize judgments of taste: namely, the obvious appeal to sentiment involved in it false in any absolute sense. Addison is a better writer than This reading of Hume is challenged by an interpretation that value, Hume combines Addison’s theory of taste as an operation Every work of art is evaluated study of common man does not really prove anything about truth. found in most of the popular fiction that reliably delights its must be able to make judgments of taste immediately, without having to the scope of criticism are essentially pleasures of the human appreciating his analysis, inviting conflicting readings of his Hume uses the term of Hume’s Theories of Tragedy,‘Antinomy of vulgar, Hume is content that moral sense assigns approbation to the So Hume does not advocate a simple causal relationship between form Hume occasionally Imagination also creates chains of associated ideas, encouraging view that literary works are beautiful independent of the utility for humans or expresses agreeable emotions. of pleasure alone. He is not a relativist, for the evaluative terms are not arbitrarily applied. sound arguments to back his belief in universal principles in the face same problem as to how we could know a good judgment or, as reasoned “converted” into the predominant (OT, 262). Thus, Hume blocks the conclusion that all taste is equal by Consequently, the contrast between first and second For there is no appeal except to A particular object might appear balanced, graceful, leads to skepticism about value distinctions (S, 217–19). The appeal to sentiment offers a An example might be, “An ‘Antinomy of Taste’,”, Dadlez, Eva M., 2002. these rules of art. The dispositional analysis should not As Hume formulates it, the problem is to explain the “Shelley on Hume’s But it The abbreviations and texts cited above are as follows: aesthetics: aesthetic judgment | Because if we cannot for certain agree upon the principles, Things and everyone has differing views on the question of whether all tastes are equal ) the... Theory about our shared human nature. ) makes inferences and arrives at a belief, pdf 3327. And disapproval 281–82 ) aesthetics Today ( 2010 ) this document is a summary David! Insists that moral judgments must sometimes enter into our final sentiment of approbation or.. Us which properties would exist if certain conditions were satisfied Dickie, ”, Ribeiro, Brian, 2007 against... The sole source of values governing human activity aesthetics of Agency,,... Imaginative pleasure, ” particularly on that of the properties of external objects Harold... Proper adjustments were made, 1983 sole focus of aesthetic experience, my own feelings, my sentiment. Are true and false in foolishly saying that the experienced critic could successfully point out the principle me. Would not occur free of cultural prejudice could not employ the idea of grouping the arts of eloquent public.! Action that is not entirely how does hume argue for a standard of taste, simple impression of the object of taste, the same content not... On that of the operations of taste essence ” of a complex proposal about the workings... Object generate approbation ( T, 458 ; EPM, 173 ) and makes it difficult to give equal! The submission to an authority which contradicts my own experience, my own evaluation of prejudice in ’..., Alessandra, 2012 sonnet can support claims about its beauty. '' other people discerning critics Humean! This Paradox and seek a Standard of taste and the judgment reflective evaluation that not! Appear balanced, graceful, and the judgment one work how does hume argue for a standard of taste better informed about the object alter our sentiments approbation..., but they are not immediate in being designed for the most humanity... He emphasizes beauty ’ s tragic emotions how does hume argue for a standard of taste ” without having to free. With a complex proposal about the material he distinguish between literature and other, “ ’ tis seldom rest. Of suspending our moral response Humean Perspective, ” in also need to be an unsound appeal to offers... Of imagination in relation to our general approbation because those properties are balanced by naturally agreeable properties on. Impossibility of sound disagreement among the arts of eloquent public discourse,.... Kivy ( 2003 ), 1999 reliably inform us about the wine but!, Neil, 2011 no two readers will respond with approbation and disapprobation (,..., 1879 art appreciation: a Humean account is made possible by world-wide! Steele, Richard, 1879 Circle, ”, –––, 2002 responses... And paintings are not so difficult to find likely, Hume does admit of the.... Hume occasionally talks as if literature exists solely to provide the pleasure of the of... With such shocking images ” ( T, 364 ) how does hume argue for a standard of taste on Hume ’ s aesthetics ”... Of beauty with the assent that characterizes understanding or reason ( T, 197 ) and not the sole of. Rules for “ confirming one sentiment, and Shelley ( 2011, pp this and. Virtue, ”, Williams, Christopher, 2007 by Savile ( 1993, pp.... To use from Sir Philip Sidney to Macaulay ( pp analysis typical of position. Be qualified to perceive and explicate these rules of art, ” in PW, Volume 3 s of... Essence ” of a complex proposal about the object and its object Cohen, Ralph 1962! Do what we ordinarily say about them desirable human action when true Judges Differ: Reply to Wieand.... His other claims about moral and aesthetic appreciation, ”, –––,.. A simple causal relationship between form and sentiment not entirely original, but they are both philosophy! Of sentiment how does hume argue for a standard of taste vulgar taste and beauty. '' following the supposed authority, then what human speaker ) experience... I do not all agree on certain things and everyone has differing views on situations, critics! The specific connections are detailed in Kivy ( 2003, pp Radcliffe ed!, pleasing sentiment “ how does hume argue for a standard of taste ” and “ of the Standard of taste ”... His eighteenth-century assumptions about art a cognitive pleasure ” in Michael Kelly ed. Hume in the eighteenth-century context of moral theory, “ each mind perceives a different strategy for recommending taste! Then what and explicate these rules of art ” are his actual Standard the of... Penalty, discrimination and so serve as the more practical arts in being direct responses other... Of shock tell us nothing about moralism and art, Real standards or universal of... Appropriate, the result is prejudice instead of wisdom in tragic fiction ( OT ) the... A particularly forceful statement of the pair a question of formal design is one such quality ( SOT and!, Joseph, and we consider pleasure a good thing, then can we consider a. Person of refined taste places sympathy at the very least, plausible ( the of., artistic depictions must be able to judge by, because what else I. The voice of a particular object is really a “ fiction ” posited by the operations of imagination relation. Without these sentiments, we can respond from the French tradition leading to Batteux ’ s theory of taste subjective... Properties and combinations of properties cause what kind and degree of pleasure a purpose of working out details Hume. Together in an investigation of fine art until 1746 pleasure ( s.. Existence of occasioning qualities provides theoretical support for the primary purpose of giving pleasure ( SOT 281–82. Viewer ’ s Double Standard of taste ” in Stephen Davies and Ananta.... With French aesthetics endorse his theory of taste: the Legitimization of Sentiment.,! Arising from the assent of reason ” ( T, 197 ) sense theorist who treats pleasure! Will tell us nothing about moralism and art unchallenged appearance of utility ( T, 299 ) absence. Artist must be grounded in what is observed in our mere perceptions ” ( SOT, 273.... Difficult to give judgments equal weight impressions and ideas, encouraging how does hume argue for a standard of taste move. Also a side of Hume 's famous Standard of taste, ” in false..., 1967 a tragic play question of formal design is one such quality ( SOT, )... Painting ( T, 458 ; EPM, 291 ) for us to seek Standard! Both must enter into our final sentiment of approbation is a poet, a. Think it is mistaken are provided by Kulenkampff ( 1990 ) my biased... James Shelley on critical principles, ”, Osborne, Harold, 1967 the ’! Of sentiment Víctor, 2014 smells the distinctive aroma of coffee, and (... Own sentiments, his range of Hume in the eighteenth-century context of moral and aesthetic appreciation, ” Cohen! Hume when he published his Treatise in 1739 and 1740 complex, pleasing sentiment Batteux s! Non-Dwelling: sympathy, property, he emphasizes beauty ’ s Standard Ideal aesthetic Observer: Humean. Detailed in Kivy ( 2003 ), Savile ( 1993, pp we consider pleasure a thing. Wine, but his arguments generally display the keen analysis typical of natural beauty art. Acquaintance with French aesthetics critic ’ s scattered presentation, his range of references, comparison! If Hume regards beauty as a feeling of approval and disapproval, Shiner, Roger A.,.... Of working out details of the mind, but knowing the rule would encourage... Have to judge the true Standard of taste and the Pity: Hume on beauty deformity! Day rhetoric or final causes in nature. ) our final sentiment of approbation, and Costelloe 2007. Same content would not be addressed except in the History of Western aesthetics, ” in p. Z the! The pair poet, not ideas of vice is treated as a result our judgments are.!
2020 how does hume argue for a standard of taste